Where do you draw the line on biological men competing in women’s sports?

Olympic boxing sunk to a new low last week. An Algerian boxer with XY chromosomes – the ordinary definition of “male” – and commensurate male testosterone levels – beat up a woman in front of thousands of cheering spectators.

The woman who was beat up had to quit 46 seconds into the match, apparently with a broken nose. In tears, she said in her native Italian “not fair, not fair” and explained afterward that she’d “never been hit so hard in my life.”

The XY boxer was declared the winner. Yesterday, the XY boxer won again in a decision where all three judges favored the XY boxer in all three rounds – it was effectively a 9-0 decision – and is headed toward the finals as a clear favorite for the gold medal.

This XY person had previously been disqualified from competition by the International Boxing Association for having tested positive for XY chromosomes and testosterone levels well above the normal range for women – and within the normal range for men.

But the International Olympic Committee disregarded those tests in a feud between them and the IBA. The IOC says the XY has a passport with “female” checked on it, and that’s good enough for them.

The follow-the-science crowd was thus persuaded, ironically, not by a chromosome test or a testosterone test, but by the bureaucrats of the Algerian passport office.  

XY chromosomes result in male anatomy, including testicles. That’s where testosterone is produced. (Testosterone is also produced in female sex organs, but in miniscule levels compared to what’s produced in male testicles.)

Testosterone produces larger, denser muscles, and greater size and strength. This is seen throughout athletics, and is the reason that almost all competitions are divided between male and female competitors.

When men compete against women, the result is a gross mismatch. We saw this in college swimming a few years ago when a swimmer with XY chromosomes who was ranked about 460 in collegiate men’s swimming decided to compete as a woman, and immediately achieved a number one ranking in the women’s sport.

In boxing, the punching power of a male is over two and a half times that of a female. Even that does not tell the whole story. Men are naturally quicker, and so they can land a punch easier and dodge their opponents’ punches easier. Their facial and other bones are bigger, thicker and denser, so they can absorb a punch better. It’s not an exaggeration to say that a man boxing against a woman is like a man boxing against a boy.

What kind of man wants to win a medal by beating up a boy or a woman in front of a cheering crowd?

A bad man, that’s what kind. A man who is arguably a deviant, attention-seeking, woman-beating sadist.

So, where do you draw the line? The IOC is apparently saying that people with XY chromosomes and male testosterone levels can compete against women – so long as they pretend to be women (at least until they launch that first punch).

But why must they pretend to be women? Pretending to be a woman does not make a man into a woman any more than pretending to be a duck makes a person into a duck – no matter how much they look, act and quack like one.

This pretending encourages deceit. It says, “We’ll let you compete as a woman so long as you lie.”

Prominent athletes have condemned these spectacles between women and pretend-women, from gay tennis great Martina Navratilova to transsexual Caitlin Jenner who won gold as Bruce Jenner.

Like them, I don’t care about a person’s sexual “identity.” If they want to hold themselves out as a man when their chromosomes and testosterone says they’re a woman, or vice versa, that’s fine by me. I’ll even play along by using their “preferred pronouns” if that makes them feel good.

But Navratilova, Jenner and I draw a rational, science-based line that does sacrifice women’s athletics on the altar of political fashions. That line is this: People with male chromosomes and testosterone should not compete as women in women’s sports. The result is unfair to women and destructive to their sports.

We’re headed to a world where the only sports are male sports and transgender “female” sports. Women with XX chromosomes need not apply, because they cannot effectively compete against the XYs.  

It’s not only unfair and wrong; it’s dangerous. It’s only a matter of time until before a man kills a woman in the ring. The IOC will have that woman’s blood on their hands.

11 thoughts on “Where do you draw the line on biological men competing in women’s sports?

  1. Another good piece Glenn. My only question is how much time will it take for this abomination of a decision to leak into ALL Olympic sports. Given the corruption and fraud rampant throughout that organization it can’t be too long. This was just one reason I avoided watching this time-sucking spectacle this season. The opening ceremony was the other.

  2. Taking that arrogant boxing fool that horribly beat this female boxer for a long walk off a short dock would be a great start.

    If their DNA shows them as male then they do NOT get to compete iin women’s classes of competition but the communists who want to destroy our culture so they can control us will not accept that…..as in this case. The modern day Olympics have become just a political sick joke. I will never watch them again.

  3. It’s possible that this Algerian boxer has Swyer syndrome, a relatively rare (1 in 80,000) genetic anomaly, where an individual is born with female genitalia but XY chromosomes and accompanying high levels of testosterone. So we should be cautious about slamming this individual, while still enforcing eligibility rules that protect other female competitors.

    • If the Algerian boxer has Swyer syndrome, wouldn’t the Algerian boxer be aware that they have Swyer syndrome?

      And wouldn’t the Algerian boxer know the physical attributes of Swyer syndrome that would benefit them against a “XX Chromosomes = Woman, a Genetic Female” in a boxing match?

      The subject has obviously come up in the Algerian boxer’s recent past. I’m pretty sure everyone has access to the internet, and a quick search will result in hundreds of medical articles to learn why it wouldn’t be competitively fair for them to compete with a boxers that have, as DogByte6RER posted, “XX Chromosomes = Woman, a Genetic Female.”

      The Algerian boxer didn’t have a say in their genetic makeup, but they do have a say in how they use it.

  4. Clearly those with xx chromosomes should compete physically only with those having xx chromosomes. Those with y chromosomes should compete physically only with those having y chromosomes. The traditional nominal male (xy) and female genders (xy) should not be the categories defining such physical competition.

  5. Inspired by our late great Founding Fathers.

    We find these truths to be self-evident …

    XX Chromosomes = Woman, a Genetic Female

    XY Chromosomes = Man, a Genetic Male

    XX Chromosomes will never change into XY Chromosomes.

    XY Chromosomes will never change into XX Chromosomes.

    Prove me wrong.

    This is so easy that even a Kindergartner can understand …

  6. Equality is equality. If women can’t compete they need to work harder instead of whining about equity or demanding segregation.

Leave a comment