CNN publishes a stolen, inaccurate report in an effort to help Iran

CNN last week got their hands on a classified document stolen from the National Security Agency. That’s a felony punishable by ten years in prison, by the way.

The stolen document guessed that the efforts by Israel and America to neutralize Iran’s nuclear weapon program had set back the program by only “a few months.”

CNN and the rest of the media cabal could hardly contain their glee. They celebrated the failure of America and Israel.

Hardly mentioned in CNN’s report was that the document itself noted that its conclusions were merely “preliminary” and were expressed with only “low confidence.” 

This week, a more considered report was published by the Institute for Science and International Security (which, ironically, has been going by the acronym ISIS since long before the ISIS terrorists came around).

ISIS – the good one – is a non-partisan think tank and investigatory group. If anything, it might lean a bit to the left, as its financial supporters include left-leaning organizations such as the McArthur Foundation, the Ford Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation. 

The Wall Street Journal reported on ISIS’s findings. (The Journal’s report is behind their paywall here, but you can click into ISIS’s underlying report here.)

ISIS concluded that Iran’s nuclear weapons program has been “effectively destroyed.”

That conclusion is supported in their report by extensive review and detailed analysis of the attacks and the videos, aided by intimate knowledge of the layouts of the Iranian facilities and interviews with international inspectors of those facilities.  

In some particulars, the ISIS report shows that the stolen preliminary report as characterized by CNN is simply wrong on the facts about what facilities were attacked, and how.

Apart from CNN, everyone else knows that the Iranian program has been hit very hard. The Israelis concluded that the Israeli and American efforts have set the Iranian program back “many years.” The U.S. Director of National Security, a dove who downplayed Iran’s nuclear ambitions a few months ago, reported yesterday that the Iranian facilities have been “destroyed.” President Trump himself reported last week that the facilities have been “obliterated.”

The head of the CIA said yesterday that Iran’s program had been “severely damaged” and would require “several years” to rebuild. Even the head of the nuclear watchdog at the U.N. – not exactly an Israel fan club – reported that the damage had to be “very significant” in view of the “the explosive payload utilized and the extreme vibration-sensitive nature of centrifuges.” Well, duh.

Meanwhile, Iran has congratulated itself on its “decisive victory.” The Ayatollah proclaimed that Israel has “almost collapsed and been crushed” and America has been delivered “a slap in the face.”

CNN has not gone that far, yet. But as of this writing, the stolen, erroneous NSA preliminary report is still on CNN’s website – with little of the contradictory reports mentioned.  

Why do the media (with the notable exception of the Wall Street Journal in this case) distort or even lie about facts, to make Iran look good and strong and make America look bad and weak?

4 thoughts on “CNN publishes a stolen, inaccurate report in an effort to help Iran

  1. Great piece. and the whole CNN action makes my blood boil. To answer your question, and IMHO:
    “Why do the media (with the notable exception of the Wall Street Journal in this case) distort or even lie about facts, to make Iran look good and strong and make America look bad and weak?”
    I believe it’s because they’re so invested in the “Orange Man Bad” narrative that to report the truth reflects very poorly on them and would make them look like to evil partisans they are.
    It appears the MSM is more concerned with their political views than the truth and actual health and safety of our country. Sad, so sad.


  2. I would add – In addition to TDS, CNN is so infused with the drumbeat that USA is a bad country that we deserve to be knocked on our heels because of our success, prosperity and freedoms. (Read: “racist, sexists, imperialistic….”). Pure brainwashing. Go figure.

  3. Well, at least it seems that we are seeing more and more statements
    regarding fake and biased news, even if fake and bias has not been
    eliminated.

    I keep hearing more and more about “so called, existential” issues. For
    example, by the Iranians and many radical Islam/Muslim religion?Nation,
    I/we hear that it s existential that the Jews and Israel cease to exist.
    Maybe it is just me taking the term literally, but to me it means that
    for their existence to continue, that event must happen.

    Yet at the same time, the “diplomatic” sort on the opposite sides
    continue to propose many “solutions” to the “existential” problem, for
    which there is no logical or real solution.

    For example, the radical approaches me stating that I am an existential
    threat to him, and I must die. I, not wanting to die, say can’t we make
    a deal. After some haggling we agree to coexist, but he gets to cut off
    my ear. That seems like a lot, but for peace, I give it a chance. So, my
    ear is sliced off, taken back to the radicals house and mounted on a
    wall with vile labels, but we have peace.

    The following week, the radical appears at my house stating, we have a
    problem. Your ear is lonesome, and I really think it needs to be
    reunited with the rest of your head on the wall by your ear, so please
    kneel.

    If something is truly existential, it is not negotiable, it is just
    either, or.

    Maybe you or clinger could hammer some more on this.

    Bill

Leave a reply to Bill Grant Cancel reply